If you've failed to keep your resolutions, Martha Beck has a way for you to succeed this year:
by joining forces with the people you least resemble (and, often, most want to throttle).
Last year four of my friends—Marlene, Ellie, Karla, and Chip—all resolved to get in shape and
lose weight. Now, these people had never met, so the odds of their making exactly the same resolution were...actually quite predictable, since pretty much everybody puts fitness on their
New Year's resolutions list. There are rumors of humans who've never resolved to eat less and
move more, but until scientists discover concrete evidence (hair, fibers, DNA-smeared doughnut
boxes), we must assume they exist only in hallucinations of ordinary people who've been weakened
by months and months of dieting.
At any rate, by last February all my friends had fallen off the resolution wagon
and were munching their way to larger clothing sizes and a profound sense of failure.
Something similar may happen to you this year, whatever your resolutions.If it does, don't
blame your weak will; blame isolation. Research shows that humans tend to do difficult things
much better in teams and groups than on their own. I suggest that this year you seek a specific
type of goal-oriented companionship I call the Fellowship of the Resolution.
The Virtue of Motley Crews
If you loved J.R.R. Tolkien's
TheLord of the Rings
(or hated it but absorbed the plot because of peer pressure), you'll recall that the Fellowship of the
Ring was a team consisting of hobbits, humans, a dwarf, a wizard, and an elf. Although these species
usually avoided one another, their disparities turned out to be essential for saving Middle Earth. The
Fellowship met monsters only a hobbit could trick, caves only a dwarf could spelunk, spells only an
elf could counter, and orcs whose strength could be overcome only by Viggo Mortensen's flexing of his
facial muscles, paralyzing the beasts with acute awareness of their inferior looks.
When it comes to New Year's resolutions, you, too, need a Fellowship. But it's not enough to
enlist your longtime BFFs—the buddies you've known forever, who think and act just like you.
As Tolkien's story suggests, the key to success is teaming up with people who are emphatically
not on your wavelength. This is especially true in behavioral patterns called conative styles.
When people talk about change, they often emphasize affective factors, which shape our
feelings, and cognitive differences, which influence thinking. They overlook patterns that
relate to doing. According to Kathy Kolbe, a specialist in learning strategies, conation is
the aspect of human consciousness that determines how we tackle any task. She has
identified four conative styles:
"Quick start" adherents swing directly into action,
making creative discoveries—and mistakes—through trial and error.
"Fact finders" need information; they're the friends who'll
research every relevant factoid about any task they're preparing to undertake.
"Follow through" people naturally use methodical systems:
They set up files for every receipt and alphabetize their refrigerator contents.
"Implementers" focus on physical objects and environments;
they figure out things by building models or grabbing the appropriate tools.
They respond better to bricks and mortar than castles in the air.
If necessary most of us can tap into and use all four conative
styles, but we tend to favor one or two of these behaviors. Yet conatively,
as in every other area of life, too much of one style can be a weakness. For
instance, consider the "failure modes" of the four dieters I mentioned earlier:
Marlene, who favors quick-start action, leaped straight into an organic raw-food
diet. Two weeks into her regimen, her hunger and disgruntlement triggered a
backslide to a menu of cupcakes and beer, which Marlene maintains today.
Ellie, who prefers the fact-finder conative style, never actually began dieting or
exercising. She's still researching and evaluating fitness programs, using a process
so detailed she'll finish her analysis next July (at the earliest).
Karla, as a follow-through, has a zest for systems, so she joined a reputable
weight loss program, which was perfect—except that she hated it. The weekly
weigh-ins terrified her, and the prescribed food had all the epicurean appeal of
bat guano. After a month, she began sleep-eating peanut butter.
Chip, with his love of the concrete implementer strategy, drastically cut his food
intake while quadrupling his level of exercise. Back spasms soon landed him in bed,
where he began inhaling polymer-based foodlike products from the minimart to ease
They each failed because their closest friends share their conative preferences,
which means they had no one to help them in the areas where they were weak. But
if these four very different people linked up as a Fellowship, things might have turned
out differently. Marlene's dynamic quick-start energy could have pushed Ellie past her
analysis paralysis. Ellie could have researched a weight loss system more suited to
Karla's taste. Karla's methodical approach could have pointed Chip toward a sustainable
exercise program, and away from the weekend warrior syndrome. And Chip's enthusiasm
for three-dimensional places and processes could have inspired the women to hit the gym
more often. (There are many more benefits this Fellowship might have discovered, but you
get the idea.)
Because I'm aware of conative styles, I never set out toward a difficult goal without a
team of opposites. I know that I mostly prefer quick-start action and hands-on implementer
creativity, and I feel about strict systems the way tigers feel about vegetarianism ("Are
you fricking kidding me?"). So when I started my own business, I hired my friend Yvonne,
who's high in both follow-through and fact finder, to run it.
Yvonne and I knew from the outset that we'd butt heads. Her meticulous system
maintenance makes me want to drive cactus spines into my skull, while my frequent
leaps into the unknown give Yvonne nightmares. But we both know that our very
differences make us a damn fine Fellowship. With me spewing ideas like the chocolate
assembly line in
I Love Lucy
and Yvonne insisting that everything get properly packaged and inventoried, we've
created things neither of us could have managed on our own.
You can achieve similar success this New Year by forming your own Fellowship of the
Resolution. First, identify your own behavior style. You can do this for a moderate fee
on Kathy Kolbe's Web site (kolbe.com; $50), or you can figure it out yourself using the loose descriptions in this column
(if you go the former route, you're probably high in follow-through or fact finder,
while taking the fast-and-loose approach suggests you have quick-start tendencies).
Please remember that you may enjoy one or two action styles, but virtually no one
is high in all four.
Next, you want to find people who prefer action styles you avoid. Meeting people
with your conative complements isn't hard, though teaming up with them will
feel a little weird. Remember, hobbits and elves and dwarfs and men were uneasy
with each other, too—but just think what would have happened to Middle Earth if any
of them had been omitted from the mix! We'd all be slaves in Mordor right now!
As you assemble your Fellowship, you can once again refer to Kathy Kolbe's
Web-based evaluation (having your collaborators take the official conation test),
or you can shoot from the hip. Since we now understand that I personally am a
hip-shooter, I've assembled some guidelines for targeting people you might want
in your Fellowship. This involves knowing your own conative dislikes and going directly
toward them, rather than running away from them:
If you have trouble getting started on difficult projects, look for a quick-start companion—
the person who shocks you by getting married, moving house, or adopting a pack of dogs
mere hours after coming up with the idea.
If you absolutely hate doing research, never reading the entire recipe or instruction manual
before starting to cook or assemble furniture, you need to find yourself a fact finder—the
kind of person who won't so much as wash her hair without first googling every ingredient
in her shampoo.
If you love creative chaos and can't stand systematic repetition, add a follow-through
to your Fellowship. This will be the friend whose closets are organized by clothing style,
color, date purchased, and price (adjusted regularly to account for market fluctuation).
If you'd rather not grapple with the actual objects involved in your resolution (reorganizing
your office, getting and using a yoga mat, devising an ingenious machine that gives you a
powerful electric shock each time you reach for the potato chips), you should team up with
an implementer. She'll be the one who raves about the joy of installing her own bathroom tiles
or taking trapeze lessons from circus acrobats.
Next:Maintaining Your Fellowship
A general rule is that your best partner will be the person who makes you shake your
head in disbelief and mutter, "I guess it takes all kinds." Because it does. (And it may help to
remember that your conative compadres will be looking at you the same way.) One more hint:
Because most people are moderately or very strong in more than one conative area, your
Fellowship could be formed with just one companion—if that person is strong in the one or
two areas in which you are weak.
Once you've got your group in place, I recommend that you take a little bit of time to
discuss your opposites-attract strategy with your Fellowship. Yvonne and I work together
successfully because we've always acknowledged our conative differences. When I hanker
to move faster than Yvonne, she reminds me, "Settle down, woman! You hired me to be a
follow-through!" When she yearns for a coworker who doesn't think quite so much like a
Labrador retriever, I point out that my quick-start enthusiasm gives her a whole lot of things
to organize. Do the same with your Fellowship, and you'll remind yourself that
everyone benefits when all four conative styles are covered.
This year I'm going to urge Marlene, Ellie, Karla, and Chip to join forces. Once people
assemble in such unlikely Fellowships, they realize an equally unlikely result: success.
Whether your resolution is to lose weight, budget better, cut back on Internet poker, or
slog to Mordor carrying the Ring of Doom, finding your motley crew of opposites will
help you make it all the way to your goals—and the Fellowship itself, I believe, will bring
great joy. Especially if it includes Viggo Mortensen.
Martha Beck is the author of six books. Her most recent is Steering By Starlight (Rodale).