Posted on Nov 22, 2007 9:32 AM
Peridot touched on this in a different thread, and quite rightly pointed out that William seems to fear nothing but hell. I have always interpreted Lady Hamleighs physical deformity as being a metaphor of the hell that William so fears. So the question of why he fears hell so much is particuarly interesting in that he seems, (in my opinion at least) to be constantly surrounded by a living embodiement of the thing he fears the most.
Mr Follett is very skilled at taking a concept that is important to our understanding of this time period, and then giving us a tangible example of the same. For me, William and his fear of hell parallels the fear that most medievals would have felt. While the understanding of the world about them was far greater than it had been in more ancient times, there still was a great gap in their knowledge of the world about them. Christianity merely placed the more pagan explanations that the ancients would have had. God was the reason for the explained and since he was such an unknown force in their lives (all rather mysterious and an area governed by priests and monks, etc, alone) it isn't difficult to understand why they would then make the leap and believe that hell was a real place, and something to be terrified of. The religious community fostered this fear because it gave them an instrument of control over the general public. Even the King would have felt this fear and would have done all he could here on earth to make sure he had a place in the afterworld. So William is already living in a world, deeply afraid of Hell and all it embodied.
But William is also a horrible person who does horrible things and while he seems to commit his sins with a great lack of conscience, we see that his conscience is merely replaced with a fear of hell. It is similar to saying that a person was not sorry that they did the wrong deed, but merely sorry that they were caught. This would apply to William. He wasn't sorry for all the rape/killings/evil deeds he does, because he has no moral conscience but he is afraid that someone else will someday judge him harshly for these deeds. It is the only show of weakness that we see as readers and seems to be the only thing that stays his actions at times. I believe that all of this stems from two things 1. the natural fear that all people of this era felt (and a fear that was so carefully orchestrated by those in power) and 2. a means that Mr. Follett uses as a way to give him a proxy conscience.
Thoughts anyone?
Mr Follett is very skilled at taking a concept that is important to our understanding of this time period, and then giving us a tangible example of the same. For me, William and his fear of hell parallels the fear that most medievals would have felt. While the understanding of the world about them was far greater than it had been in more ancient times, there still was a great gap in their knowledge of the world about them. Christianity merely placed the more pagan explanations that the ancients would have had. God was the reason for the explained and since he was such an unknown force in their lives (all rather mysterious and an area governed by priests and monks, etc, alone) it isn't difficult to understand why they would then make the leap and believe that hell was a real place, and something to be terrified of. The religious community fostered this fear because it gave them an instrument of control over the general public. Even the King would have felt this fear and would have done all he could here on earth to make sure he had a place in the afterworld. So William is already living in a world, deeply afraid of Hell and all it embodied.
But William is also a horrible person who does horrible things and while he seems to commit his sins with a great lack of conscience, we see that his conscience is merely replaced with a fear of hell. It is similar to saying that a person was not sorry that they did the wrong deed, but merely sorry that they were caught. This would apply to William. He wasn't sorry for all the rape/killings/evil deeds he does, because he has no moral conscience but he is afraid that someone else will someday judge him harshly for these deeds. It is the only show of weakness that we see as readers and seems to be the only thing that stays his actions at times. I believe that all of this stems from two things 1. the natural fear that all people of this era felt (and a fear that was so carefully orchestrated by those in power) and 2. a means that Mr. Follett uses as a way to give him a proxy conscience.
Thoughts anyone?
The Oprah Winfrey Show
Oprah's Best Life Series
Harpo Films
For One More Day
The Great Debaters
O, The Oprah Magazine
Subscribe Today
Oprah Radio
Oprah's Angel Network
Oprah's Book Club
