FEATUREDEckhart Tolle A New EarthA Course in Miracles Take today's lesson!Know Yourself Things every woman should know |
FEATUREDWellness and Prevention Too sick to go to work? Take the self-assessment
Weight Loss One-bite-at-a-time diet makeover |
FEATURED |
FEATUREDCouples Why men cheat |
FEATUREDDecorating Ty Pennington's quick decorating tipsNate Berkus See Nate's most moving makeover in years! |
FEATUREDGlobal Issues The PROTECT Our Children Act passed!Health World health 101People and Politics A side of Barbara Walters you've never seen
|
I argee that Dr. Oz should have been more careful about what he said. I agree that women should not feel obligated or pressured to submit. I assume he did not intend to say that even if that is what he seemed to be saying.
I am surprised he did not emphasize the reason for what he is saying. It is my understanding that the value of sex is excercize; simple ejaculation is not beneficial for the purposes of what he is talking about; correct?
Something else I have not heard him emphasize is that sex is much more beneficial for excercize for the person on top, correct? The person on the bottom (I will try to be careful here) will likely get much less excercize than the person on the bottom, correct? Yet that is never mentioned.
Something else that is seldom mentioned is that excercize in general is important. It is not clear to me why a person getting excercize either from sex or from other physical activity is getting more benefit when it is sex. My guess is that non-sexual physical activity can be comparable to sex for excercize. I think we need a discussion of that.
I have met husbands who's wives do not allow their husbands the time to excercize. I think Dr. Oz should tell wives that they should allow men to get excercize somehow. Wives also need excercize of course. I think Dr. Oz should tell the truth; when women are on the bottom, they don't get much excercize, so the sex does not benefit them in that manner. I hope no one objects to me saying that. We all need excercize, even single people, and we don't have to get it with sex.
I am a guy that would be happy to do it two or three times a day every day if I could.
I am also skeptical of the accuracy of Dr. Oz's answers.
I am not a doctor but I am an expert on my body. I know that what I feel when I get an erection cannot be just blood in the manner most popularly describe; what I feel is muscle. Real sex experts talk about male love muscles as well as female love muscles. I think millions of men could benefit from knowing that their masculine love muscles can be strengthened. This is the big secret that Dr. Oz can share with the world, and get abundant attention from sharing the information.
Some sexologists will recommend Kegel excercizes but I think even that has limited benefit for love muscles. If anyone is interested, try searching the internet for Kegels and/or love muscles.
<hr />
OOOOHH noone giving a BAD comment to this show !!!!!! That is a shocker when they mentioned the PENIS....
OOOh OOh we are actually progressing from the last comments I read about the talk about SEX.....
By the way Oprah, great shows, nomatter what they are about, keep up the great informative shows, in television
you can't please everyone... How about a show on keeping the spark alive after 35 yrs of marriage.
Hi, Chingaling! Are you with Freelife?
Hi Yes I am. I have tried the Mangosteen(no company names) and it helped me. However the goji works better for MY body. I believe everyone should be taking either one of them, along with a good multi vitamin.
If you want to contact me that would be fine.
mjbiz@verizon.net
I will not be able to visit this posting site as frequently as I do now.
Thanks.
I am open for anyone to contact me as long as it is genuine.
Again, OPRAH AND DR OZ THANK YOU FOR YOUR SHOW
Amen! Amen! You expressed my sentiments exactly! I almost couldn't believe my ears when I heard Dr. Oz's comment. I thought for sure that after the men calmed down from their hearty applause, Dr. Oz would make another comment qualifying his earlier statements. He didn't. I was shocked.
I have long wanted Oprah to do a show for men about how to make love to their woman. Oh my gosh - she's the one to do it.
Tenderness, compliments, romance -- all do wonders for a woman's libido.
Please, Oprah, how about it? If you made this show and sold tapes, you could probably fund hundreds of your schools!
Hello Oprah I enjoyed the show with Dr. Oz. however I would like to Ask Dr, Oz which is the best medicine to take with the problem of Ed Viagra, Cialas, or Levetra. I also would like to know what you feel about products that are suppose to be all natural. I heard of one called stayerect which also claims to help cure ED After about 3 months. it comes with yohimbe or with out. Please Help Changing50
That was a funny and imformative show. Dr. Oz was great! But! I sure did miss Oprah. I don't care that she was close by with the wives and partners of the men in the audience. I didn't get my daily dose of Oprah, so I had to wait until the next day. I hope Dr.Oz gets his own show, he's good alright, but that was too much time on Oprahs show. Oprah, please don't do that again. I missed you!
I don't think its fair that it was said that men need sex 3 to 4 times a week. Really, wives work, come home, take care of the kids, cook, clean, bathe kids, put kids to bed, by the time they are done they are so tired they just want to sleep. Men they come home watch TV, drink beer, eat dinner and then since they have rested, they want to hanky panky all the time. Its tough being a wife, mother, etc. Give us a break!!!!!
My Dearest Oprah,
Just a point I notice; as I was one of the members of your First All Male audience with Dr. Oz on the topic Men's Health. I notice that you didn't give away Dr. Oz's book. What's up with that? I just knew that you were going to give your First All Male audience the works. For example, Oprah's Best Gifts For Guys or Oprah's Biggest Gift to the First Male audience " A Jeep" ("You Get a Jeep and You get a Jeep and You get a Jeep!"). Just a thought as I watch the announcement of your new book for the "O" Book Club.
Still Enjoying Your Show,
DeSean
Kudos to you, terimary! Couldn't have said it better myself!
I was watching Dr. Oz talking about mens health last week and found it very helpful. He touched on several topics and the one that caught my interest was Testicular Cancer. He was right about the symptoms with the discomfort in the groin area along with the tenderness of the nipples. I should know. I had those symptoms 26 years ago when I was told I had Testicular Cancer. If my doctor at the time would have been more aware of this type of cancer, my treatment would not have been what it was. I had 2 surgeries and 3 sessions of chemotherapy. Since that time I have been cancer free. I thank God my urologist and my oncologist were. So if you have any of these symptoms no matter how little, see yor doctor.
Following viewing Oprah program 7-10-07 "Dr. Oz talks to men" Oz did a great job overall here considering the volume of material he was tasked with covering in time allowed. Oz's response to the subject of circumcision has me concerned. What in his data gathering would cause him to say that American medical societies -do not- have a position on the subject? 2000 American Medical Association "The AMA supports the general principles of the 1999 Circumcision Policy Statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics." 1999 American Academy of Pediatrics "Existing scientific evidence demonstrates potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision; however, these data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision." 2002 Canadian Paediatric Society (reaffirmed 1996 position) "Circumcision of newborns should not be routinely performed." 1996 Australian College of Paediatrics "The Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons has informed the College that 'neonatal male circumcision has no medical indication." And many other medical and pediatric professional associations around the world hold the same view. _no medical indication_ are the important words in that statement. I find it difficult to think that Dr Oz didn't have the time to research the data given the depth of knowledge the Dr. has demonstrated on many other subjects. Perhaps the Dr's cultural/family background has influenced his professional opinion? The more I think about it, the more I believe the Dr.'s opinion on circumcision is simply _irresponsible_ given the importance of this particular part of a man's anatomy throughout his life. The most puzzling part of the Dr.'s short and biased statement on the subject was the almost throwaway mention that circumcision removes 50 percent of the most sensitive tissue on the penis. This tissue has everything to do with the sensation a man feels _during_ intercourse. If this were a procedure performed on females with similar effect on sensation throughout life would Oprah and her producers consider an opinion? There are many sources of information regarding circumcision out there, on the internet and otherwise. I invite any parent-to-be to read the opinion and consider the serious risks that come with circumcision before having the procedure performed on their child. As Dr. Oz stated in this program, sex is a very, very important element of a man's health and emotional well being throughout his life, physical sensation plays a huge part in that well being. If this message is viewed by the producers of the Oprah show or Oprah herself, I urge you to revisit the subject with balanced coverage of the facts, regardless the social discomfort some people seem to have about the subject. All sorts of medically and personally harmful customs have been reconsidered in the course of human history, at least consider that this could be one of them. In the 1890s circumcision became popular as a treatment for male infants and was urged as a preventive of "congenital phimosis," masturbation, syphilis, epilepsy, hip diseases, bed wetting, and many more disorders. A solution looking for a problem? Looks like another strange practice of the victorians that America hasn't rid itself of yet.